<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On The Job Status Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2008/04/18/on-the-job-status-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2008/04/18/on-the-job-status-report/</link>
	<description>Stunt software news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:47:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2008/04/18/on-the-job-status-report/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 06:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntblog.com/?p=43#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Check the main blog, an update has been posted if you are just following this thread as I was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check the main blog, an update has been posted if you are just following this thread as I was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: discouraged user</title>
		<link>http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2008/04/18/on-the-job-status-report/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>discouraged user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntblog.com/?p=43#comment-168</guid>
		<description>i spent money on on the job software because &quot;version 3 will be out soon&quot; and version 2 looked great and with promises for cool new features i jumped right in. more than a year later i still get an upgrade to version 3 ...very very soon. quite frustrating to say the least...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i spent money on on the job software because &#8220;version 3 will be out soon&#8221; and version 2 looked great and with promises for cool new features i jumped right in. more than a year later i still get an upgrade to version 3 &#8230;very very soon. quite frustrating to say the least&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2008/04/18/on-the-job-status-report/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntblog.com/?p=43#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Soon is a relative term. It could mean &quot;any second now&quot; â€” though in the case of OTJ it seems to mean &quot;within the next decade&quot;, or &quot;when I get around to it&quot;... After all, OTJ 3 has been &quot;coming soon&quot; for a while now. Anyways, thanks for sharing George. I wouldn&#039;t get my hopes up though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soon is a relative term. It could mean &#8220;any second now&#8221; â€” though in the case of OTJ it seems to mean &#8220;within the next decade&#8221;, or &#8220;when I get around to it&#8221;&#8230; After all, OTJ 3 has been &#8220;coming soon&#8221; for a while now. Anyways, thanks for sharing George. I wouldn&#8217;t get my hopes up though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2008/04/18/on-the-job-status-report/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntblog.com/?p=43#comment-178</guid>
		<description>All I can tell you is that was what he mentioned to me in an email. Thought we might have seen something by now though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I can tell you is that was what he mentioned to me in an email. Thought we might have seen something by now though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2008/04/18/on-the-job-status-report/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntblog.com/?p=43#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Oh, really? Any minute now I&#039;m sure...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, really? Any minute now I&#8217;m sure&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2008/04/18/on-the-job-status-report/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntblog.com/?p=43#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Just got a reply, Dan says he&#039;ll be updating the blog soon and that OTJ 3.0 is coming along nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got a reply, Dan says he&#8217;ll be updating the blog soon and that OTJ 3.0 is coming along nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2008/04/18/on-the-job-status-report/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntblog.com/?p=43#comment-141</guid>
		<description>I just sent off an email to Dan to ask for a new blog post for On The Job progress. Thought maybe he might not be receiving the comment notifications on his blog or something, worth a shot at the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just sent off an email to Dan to ask for a new blog post for On The Job progress. Thought maybe he might not be receiving the comment notifications on his blog or something, worth a shot at the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2008/04/18/on-the-job-status-report/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntblog.com/?p=43#comment-171</guid>
		<description>For any of you that wonder if perhaps Dan is slaving away at creating OTJ 3 with no time even to update us on his progress... He still has plenty of time to post to twitter: http://twitter.com/danmessing.

My best guess at this point: Dan is wondering what to do with OTJ; sell it to another developer, or just let it die. Why else would it be so hard to set some very basic expectations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For any of you that wonder if perhaps Dan is slaving away at creating OTJ 3 with no time even to update us on his progress&#8230; He still has plenty of time to post to twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/danmessing" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/danmessing</a>.</p>
<p>My best guess at this point: Dan is wondering what to do with OTJ; sell it to another developer, or just let it die. Why else would it be so hard to set some very basic expectations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2008/04/18/on-the-job-status-report/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 03:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntblog.com/?p=43#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Dan,
Like everyone else here I am looking forward to OTJ 3.0. 2.3.1 is feeling rougher and rougher around the edges every day.

Why not release a developer alpha to people who have tested for you before, and all of those that have commented here. That way your users would at least know that there was reason to hang on and not abandon OTJ for something else. Without user comments how do you know if you are on track in terms of features ? I guess I am just spoiled by working with Jess @ HogBay on TaskPaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,<br />
Like everyone else here I am looking forward to OTJ 3.0. 2.3.1 is feeling rougher and rougher around the edges every day.</p>
<p>Why not release a developer alpha to people who have tested for you before, and all of those that have commented here. That way your users would at least know that there was reason to hang on and not abandon OTJ for something else. Without user comments how do you know if you are on track in terms of features ? I guess I am just spoiled by working with Jess @ HogBay on TaskPaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.J. Coughlin</title>
		<link>http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2008/04/18/on-the-job-status-report/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>E.J. Coughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntblog.com/?p=43#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Six months since the last &quot;status report&quot;... you must be able to tell us something... anything... by now...

Please???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Six months since the last &#8220;status report&#8221;&#8230; you must be able to tell us something&#8230; anything&#8230; by now&#8230;</p>
<p>Please???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

