<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WWDC Quick Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2007/06/14/wwdc-quick-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2007/06/14/wwdc-quick-thoughts/</link>
	<description>Stunt software news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:47:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven Freitas</title>
		<link>http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2007/06/14/wwdc-quick-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Freitas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 01:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntblog.com/2007/06/14/wwdc-quick-thoughts/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Stacks have been around since before OSX. They where originally on the desktop and I believe that they where just referred to as piles. I actually like the original implementation better, but it does fit with where Apple is going with the Dock. When you moused over a pile on the desktop, it would fan out out and a preview icon of the current item would appear above the pile. Piles could be moved, copied, deleted and so on as one item and you could add / remove items from each pile. Here is an article about piles - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/04/23/deep_inside_apples_piles/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacks have been around since before OSX. They where originally on the desktop and I believe that they where just referred to as piles. I actually like the original implementation better, but it does fit with where Apple is going with the Dock. When you moused over a pile on the desktop, it would fan out out and a preview icon of the current item would appear above the pile. Piles could be moved, copied, deleted and so on as one item and you could add / remove items from each pile. Here is an article about piles &#8211; <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/04/23/deep_inside_apples_piles/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/04/23/deep_inside_apples_piles/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Stacks Competition for Overflow? &#124; MacApper</title>
		<link>http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2007/06/14/wwdc-quick-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Stacks Competition for Overflow? &#124; MacApper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntblog.com/2007/06/14/wwdc-quick-thoughts/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>[...] I wanted to see what Stunt Software thought of the new competition. Here is a relating entry I found on the Stunt Software blog: There is a lot of stuff that Overflow does that Stacks doesnâ€™t, and I think there is a lot that Overflow can do in the future to continue to innovate (to continue with the general overuse of that term). I get the impression that Stacks are meant to be used as more of a temporary holding place, whereas Overflow is much more configurable, accessible via a hot-key, and not something that youâ€™ll likely want to change the contents of every day. -Dan Messing, Stunt Software [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wanted to see what Stunt Software thought of the new competition. Here is a relating entry I found on the Stunt Software blog: There is a lot of stuff that Overflow does that Stacks doesnâ€™t, and I think there is a lot that Overflow can do in the future to continue to innovate (to continue with the general overuse of that term). I get the impression that Stacks are meant to be used as more of a temporary holding place, whereas Overflow is much more configurable, accessible via a hot-key, and not something that youâ€™ll likely want to change the contents of every day. -Dan Messing, Stunt Software [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hall</title>
		<link>http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2007/06/14/wwdc-quick-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntblog.com/2007/06/14/wwdc-quick-thoughts/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Dan, I&#039;m pretty sure Stacks won&#039;t &quot;Watson&quot; Overflow. AFAIK Stacks doesn&#039;t have &quot;catagory&quot; tabs, so it&#039;s going to take up more space on the Dock (if you have a lot of &quot;catagories&quot; like I do...) whereas Overflow is invisible (i.e., takes up NO space) until it&#039;s invoked.

While I&#039;ve got you, I have a suggestion for a future version. Could you have a preferences option that opens Overflow at the cursor instead of where it last was? That way the user can invoke Overflow with a mouse button (or function key) and not have to move the mouse so far to reach the icon of the app they wish to launch... Just a thought :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, I&#8217;m pretty sure Stacks won&#8217;t &#8220;Watson&#8221; Overflow. AFAIK Stacks doesn&#8217;t have &#8220;catagory&#8221; tabs, so it&#8217;s going to take up more space on the Dock (if you have a lot of &#8220;catagories&#8221; like I do&#8230;) whereas Overflow is invisible (i.e., takes up NO space) until it&#8217;s invoked.</p>
<p>While I&#8217;ve got you, I have a suggestion for a future version. Could you have a preferences option that opens Overflow at the cursor instead of where it last was? That way the user can invoke Overflow with a mouse button (or function key) and not have to move the mouse so far to reach the icon of the app they wish to launch&#8230; Just a thought <img src='http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emilcar - Impresiones de un programador &#8220;damnificado&#8221; por Leopard</title>
		<link>http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2007/06/14/wwdc-quick-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>emilcar - Impresiones de un programador &#8220;damnificado&#8221; por Leopard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 09:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntblog.com/2007/06/14/wwdc-quick-thoughts/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>[...] Echando un vistazo al programa, descubrÃ­ el blog del programador donde el hombre habla de las sensaciones que tuvo al ver que Leopard incorpora una caracterÃ­stica MUY parecida a su programa. Ã‰l tiene la impresiÃ³n de que esas stacks son ubicaciones mÃ¡s o menos temporales de accesos y archivos, algo que vas a usar por un tiempo mientras estÃ¡s haciendo un proyecto, mientras que su programa es muy configurable y tendente a un sistema de trabajo estable. En su web tiene un vÃ­deo de cÃ³mo funciona el Overflow y la verdad es que resulta mÃ¡s que interesante, aunque sea de pago.    Comparte: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Echando un vistazo al programa, descubrÃ­ el blog del programador donde el hombre habla de las sensaciones que tuvo al ver que Leopard incorpora una caracterÃ­stica MUY parecida a su programa. Ã‰l tiene la impresiÃ³n de que esas stacks son ubicaciones mÃ¡s o menos temporales de accesos y archivos, algo que vas a usar por un tiempo mientras estÃ¡s haciendo un proyecto, mientras que su programa es muy configurable y tendente a un sistema de trabajo estable. En su web tiene un vÃ­deo de cÃ³mo funciona el Overflow y la verdad es que resulta mÃ¡s que interesante, aunque sea de pago.    Comparte: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Zornek</title>
		<link>http://stuntsoftware.com/blog/2007/06/14/wwdc-quick-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Zornek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuntblog.com/2007/06/14/wwdc-quick-thoughts/#comment-112</guid>
		<description>I was thinking of your app vs. Stacks as well. Glad to hear you think it&#039;s got room to live on it&#039;s own. Also, it was nice to meet you this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking of your app vs. Stacks as well. Glad to hear you think it&#8217;s got room to live on it&#8217;s own. Also, it was nice to meet you this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

